At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
还有一点,做到这里感觉gmat关于这种一增一减的选项基本上都是避开不选的。从前面的种植间距30英尺到15英尺,每亩种更多,但存活率更低/再到前面的fare减少,但客户增多/再到这里的用餐时间减少接待客户增多,但点单减少/
他们好像都不是正确答案......以后看见这种一增一减的选项一定要好好看一下是否存在漏洞
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论