With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia and with previously established companies adding many jobs, a record number of new jobs were created last year in the Derderian economy. This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year. Therefore, unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
Each year, new companies starting up create more new jobs overall than do previously established companies.
Companies established last year will not add a greater number of jobs overall this year than they did last year.
This year, the new companies starting up will not provide substantially more jobs per company than did new companies last year.
This year, the overall number of jobs created by previously established companies will be less than the overall number of jobs lost at those companies.
The number of jobs created in the Derderian economy last year was substantially larger than the number of jobs lost last year.
这题关键点是结论的 a record number of company
结论说:想要破去年的新创就业数的记录,今年一定要成立很多很多很多的新公司啊
这里讨论的是新公司数量和总工作数量的关系
今年的新创的总工作量=老公司创的+新公司创的;文段前提已经说了,老公司创造的工作数量比去年少,说明今年老公司只会拖破纪录的后腿,破纪录的全部希望只能寄托在新公司的身上了;
那么要让新公司创造很多很多很多很多的工作,只有通过建立很多很多很多的新公司这一个办法么?
不一定啊,还可以是:今年的新公司很牛逼,一个公司就可以创造很多很多很多很多的新工作,所以不用建立很多很多很多公司数,就可以破纪录了;
所以为了支持文段的结论,只能把新公司很牛逼的这种可能否定掉了;
ABDE都是超出讨论范围的回答,A把新旧公司进行对比,BD描述了一些老公司的状态是怎么样的,E的内容和文段都没什么关系,只有C在讨论新
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论