Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause, since in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40. SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus. Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers' hypothesis?
SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent contamination with SV40.
Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of the virus.
In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to asbestos.
In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.
我也错选了C,但E确实比C好, 原因在于科学家的假设是被污染的疫苗就是M中病毒的源头,由于文章中讲60%的纸巾中都含有M,M中有SV病毒,人们用了就比较容易得癌症,所以其实重点是在M的,而C中只说了1960年的疫苗中可追溯到病毒,但如果这种病毒并没有污染M,那么显然就不会造成癌症。所以关键在于没有和M联系起来。
tissue不是纸巾是组织啦23333。还有我是这样想的:C 就算现在还能从那批疫苗中trace到virus,也不代表当年得M病的人是那批vaccine害的(some这个词很重要),也许他们接触了其他virus来源。而E是很好的无因无果的支持(never一词也很重要)。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论