扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E2-CR-35
It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable
Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised
Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians
Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians
Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired
一项新法律允许药物广告面对大众。反对者认为普通人缺乏判断广告的能力，可能会要求医生开不适合的处方。
但是由于医生拥有最后的话语权，因此误开药方的现象不会变得更频繁。
choice b, 是否面向大众的医药广告和面向医生的广告提供的信息是一样的。irrelevant，医生不一定需要advertisement作出是否开药的判断。同理choice c也是irrelevant
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论