It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable
Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised
Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians
Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians
Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired
来自RON大神:从有最终决定权的人的观点出发(假设你是医生)。结论说的是因为医生有最终话语权,所以处方药不会被乱开。(因果联系)
B:即使有人无缘无故问你开药,但你是还是能决定是否开药给他。
E:如果你让步给病人开药,可能就会造成乱开药的情况。
ACD无关。
这题做完点Next的一瞬间就觉得糟糕了
这题结论的要点是,最后开不开还是在医师!!你跑去问他,他不给你开,那还不是卵用没有,所以B的错的。
E这里词汇很重要 succumb屈服,屈服于病人的压力,你不开是吧,老子天天找你闹事,你开不开,如果你开,那就推翻原文结论,如果死不开,那就支持原文结论。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论