Offshore oil-drilling operations entail an unavoidable risk of an oil spill, but importing oil on tankers presently entails an even greater such risk per barrel of oil. Therefore, if we are to reduce the risk of an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, we must invest more in offshore operations and import less oil on tankers.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
Tankers can easily be redesigned so that their use entails less risk of an oil spill.
Oil spills caused by tankers have generally been more serious than those caused by offshore operations.
The impact of offshore operations on the environment can be controlled by careful management.
Offshore operations usually damage the ocean floor, but tankers rarely cause such damage.
Importing oil on tankers is currently less expensive than drilling for it offshore.
oil-drilling带来oil spill的风险,但是importing oil on tankers 带来更高的风险。
因此如果想要降低风险,又不用抑制oil use。应该投入更多在oil-drilling,减少importing oil on tankers
choice a, tanker可以被轻易得重新设计这样oil spill的风险更小。correct
choice d, offshore会破坏海床,而tankers不会带来这样的破坏。 -> 算是offshore的一个副作用,但是依然无法撼动offshore lower risk的优点
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论