The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills. In fact, the quotas will help "mini-mills" flourish in the United States. Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.
Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claim made in the last sentence above?
Quality rather than price is a major factor in determining the type of steel to be used for a particular application.
Foreign steel mills have long produced grades of steel comparable in quality to the steel produced by the big American mills.
American quotas on imported goods have often induced other countries to impose similar quotas on American goods.
Domestic "mini-mills" consistently produce better grades of steel than do the big American mills.
Domestic "mini-mills" produce low-volume, specialized types of steel that are not produced by the big American steel mills.
小的从大的那里抢得更多的生意,没看懂句子啊哭
C:钢铁进口限制令不会帮助美国的大型钢铁企业,而是帮助mini-mills。
choice b, 进口钢铁的质量和美国本土大型钢铁企业生产的钢铁质量相当。 irrelevant, 无法解释为什么mini-mills抢走大钢铁公司的生意
choice e, mini-mills生产低产量、特殊型号的钢铁,这种是大厂不会生产的。correct
根据文章:在没有配额限制时期,本国小厂从BASM得到的订单已经比外国工厂多了,那么如果限制进口配额(外国工厂的订单会下降),本国工厂就会得到更多的订单,所以限制进口配额对BASM没什么意义。
P:(果)限制进口配额的时候对BASM不利,对小厂更有利
C:(因)不限制进口配额的时候小厂比国外订单的多
E选项,小厂只生产低产量的特型钢(他因:限制进口配额时,外国工厂订单少了,小厂也不会多,这些订单只可能是BASM自己生产)
啊。。。我说怎么我做错了,我还以为是小厂从大厂那里接活呢登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
P:强制配额会 help 小钢铁厂,而不会help大厂
C:因为小钢铁厂 从大厂那里抢更多的生意,比没有配额限制时 外国厂从大厂那里抢的更多
(小比外国抢生意更多)
E:小厂生产的,大厂不生产------小厂和大厂无竞争关系----小厂不会抢大厂的生意----就不可能比外国人抢的多