Robot satellites relay important communications and identify weather patterns. Because the satellites can be repaired only in orbit, astronauts are needed to repair them. Without repairs, the satellites would eventually malfunction. Therefore, space flights carrying astronauts must continue.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?
Satellites falling from orbit because of malfunctions burn up in the atmosphere.
Although satellites are indispensable in the identification of weather patterns, weather forecasters also make some use of computer projections to identify weather patterns.
The government, responding to public pressure, has decided to cut the budget for space flights and put more money into social welfare programs.
Repair of satellites requires heavy equipment, which adds to the amount of fuel needed to lift a spaceship carrying astronauts into orbit.
Technical obsolescence of robot satellites makes repairing them more costly and less practical than sending new, improved satellites into orbit.
原文说还是修吧,选项说修不如扔了省钱/。。。。
绝对化的表达:
1.情态动词must,should:必须用这种方式才能...
2.最高级best most least等:这个方式利润最大化
3.高程度的副词,判断的语气范围变大或者变小:significantly,regularly,seriously:很大程度地增长
p:不修就会坏
c:载人必须继续(载人是为了修卫星)---
总结c:必须修卫星
must continue(太绝对,肯定有其他解决方法)
求分类啊,这是个因果类型的还是方案类型的呀?
因果
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论