Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
Garnet and RenCo each provide health care for their employees. Garnet pays for both testing of its employees' cholesterol levels and treatment of high cholesterol. This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. However, RenCo does not have the same financial incentive to adopt such a policy, because __________.
early treatment of high cholesterol does not entirely eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life
the mass media regularly feature stories encouraging people to maintain diets that are low in cholesterol
RenCo has significantly more employees than Garnet has
RenCo's employees are unlikely to have higher cholesterol levels than Garnet's employees
the average length of time an employee stays with RenCo is less than it is with Garnet
G和R都为员工提供health care(HC)
∵胆固醇水平高了但置之不理,会导致疾病变严重了很费钱
∴G:对员工的胆固醇水平测量、并给予治疗→R能省钱
但是R没有采用这个策略
果因,寻找策略不合理之处,或者G和R的不同之处
A、早期治疗并不能完全削减后来爆发的可能性(但拖着不治疗不是更不好吗?而且,用了not entirely,说明G策略还是有用的),有些反原文
B、大众传媒呼吁民众保持低胆固醇饮食,无关
C、R比G的雇员多,无关,一定程度上加强
D、R的员工不可能比G胆固醇水平高(打开脑洞:如果G\R两家的胆固醇水平都达到爆发严重疾病的水准,那就是小巫见大巫,也不用比了),无关
E、R的员工比G待的时间短(也就是说还没等病情爆发R员工就离职了,哼哼,资本家),CORRECT
D说R有更低的 cholesterol levels,不等于没有,那么少数的人在R公司里面工作长时间,并且high levels,后期还是需要接受expensive治疗,R就应该还是需要采纳这个战略,所以错误。
This policy saves Garnet money, since high cholesterol left untreated for many years leads to conditions that require very expensive treatment. 这句话中的many years所以选E,这病需要拖很久才会需要expensive treatment
D为啥错呀登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A:早起治疗不能完全避免之后中风 ----- 如果是这样,那第一个公司也不会去治疗了
E:只有两家公司有差别,差别在第二个公司的员工普遍呆的时间不长
Garnet有财政动力为员工购买医疗服务并因此节省费用。Renco没有财政动力这么做,因为choce e, Renco员工不像Garnet员工呆那么久
G:high C长期不治疗→大量的花费,in other words:采取政策→省钱
final conclusion,for R:采取政策→并不省钱,in other words:长期不治疗≠大量花费。
D R的患病率不太可能比G高,说明两者可能差不多,也可能R很低,都不代表R没有financial incentive去帮员工体检
G&R在是否有动机去为员工谋福利出现不同点1,其他所有条件相同,我们需要找出导致不同点1的另外一个不同点
D是一个错误假设,high不high与原文无关
E是另外一个不同点(点2)
题里面特殊给出了说这个病潜伏多年之后的治疗非常贵,而这个多年之后会变贵的后果是Garnet提供检测和治疗的原因,所以如果R不做,就是说R没这个financial incentive 激励他去做。D的比较说明了X导致G do Y,R没有do Y,因为R没有X。C虽然也比较了,但比了个别的,而且不likely 不代表不得,得的少但是治疗费用高,也未见得就省钱了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论