Ethnohistoric documents from sixteenth-century Mexico suggesting that weaving and cooking were the most common productive activities for Aztec women may lead modern historians to underestimate the value of women's contributions to Aztec society. Since weaving and cooking occurred mostly (but not entirely) in a domestic setting, modern historians are likely to apply to the Aztec culture the modern Western distinction between "private" and "public" production. Thus, the ethnohistoric record conspires with Western culture to foster the view that women's production was not central to the demographic, economic, and political structures in sixteenth-century Mexico.
A closer examination of Aztec culture indicates that treating Aztec women's production in Mexico in such a manner would be a mistake. Even if the products of women's labor did not circulate beyond the household, such products were essential to population growth. Researchers document a tenfold increase in the population of the valley of Mexico during the previous four centuries, an increase that was crucial to the developing Aztec political economy. Population growth--which could not have occurred in the absence of successful household economy, in which women's work was essential--made possible the large-scale development of labor-intensive chinampa (ridged-field) agriculture in the southern valley of Mexico which, in turn, supported urbanization and political centralization in the Aztec capital.
But the products of women's labor did in fact circulate beyond the household. Aztec women wove cloth, and cloth circulated through the market system, the tribute system, and the redistributive economy of the palaces. Cotton mantles served as a unit of currency in the regional market system. Quantities of woven mantles, loincloths, blouses, and skirts were paid as tribute to local lords and to imperial tax stewards and were distributed to ritual and administrative personnel, craft specialists, warriors, and other faithful servants of the state. In addition, woven articles of clothing served as markers of social status and clothing fulfilled a symbolic function in political negotiation. The cloth that was the product of women's work thus was crucial as a primary means of organizing the flow of goods and services that sustained the Aztec state.
The passage is primarily concerned with
using modern understanding of cultural bias to challenge ethnohistoric documents
evaluating competing descriptions of women's roles in Aztec society
comparing the influence of gender on women's roles in Aztec society and in modern society
remedying a potential misconception about the significance of women's roles in Aztec society
applying new evidence in a reevaluation of ethnohistoric documents
题目分析:
题目释义:
主旨题目
考点:
主旨(Main idea)
旨在考察我们对文章整体的把握程度,对文章的结构的分析能力和把控能力,以及对作者逻辑的判断。
这篇文章主旨比较清晰,作者是想更正被人们误解的阿兹特克女性的地位。第一段总起,而后两段都在证明第一段说的内容。
选项分析:
A选项:用现在对于文化偏见的理解来挑战人种历史的档案。这个历史的档案本身没有问题,是现代历史学家对其的理解有问题,作者通过文章希望可以更正这种错误的理解。
B选项:评估对于阿兹特克社会女性地位的不能同时接受的描述。文章中只有一种描述,就是underestimate的描述,其原因是由于研究者的误解造成的。主旨不是评估各种描述。
C选项:评估对于阿兹特克社会女性地位的不能同时接受的描述。文章中只有一种描述,就是underestimate的描述,其原因是由于研究者的误解造成的。主旨不是评估各种描述。
D选项:Correct. 纠正潜在的关于阿兹特克社会对女性地位的意义的误解。在“考点”中已经解释过正确的原因,此处不再赘述。
E选项:在重新评估人种历史档案时实施新的证据。作者并没有想重新评估这个档案,而是想纠正以前人们对这个档案的解读。
错选B
B. descriptions是复数,表示本文有多种description,但是文中只有一种就是被underestimate的description,所以错误。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论