In the 1980's, astronomer Bohdan Paczynski proposed a way of determining whether the enormous dark halo constituting the outermost part of the Milky Way galaxy is composed of MACHO's (massive compact halo objects), which are astronomical objects too dim to be visible. Paczynski reasoned that if MACHO's make up this halo, a MACHO would occasionally drift in front of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a bright galaxy near the Milky Way. The gravity of a MACHO that had so drifted, astronomers agree, would cause the star's light rays, which would otherwise diverge, to bend together so that, as observed from Earth, the star would temporarily appear to brighten, a process known as microlensing. Because many individual stars are of intrinsically variable brightness, some astronomers have contended that the brightening of intrinsically variable stars can be mistaken for microlensing. However, whereas the different colors of light emitted by an intrinsically variable star are affected differently when the star brightens, all of a star's colors are equally affected by microlensing. Thus, if a MACHO magnifies a star's red light tenfold, it will do the same to the star's blue light and yellow light. Moreover, it is highly unlikely that a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud will undergo microlensing more than once, because the chance that a second MACHO would pass in front of exactly the same star is minuscule.
According to the passage, Paczynski's theory presumes that if MACHO's constituted the Milky Way's dark halo, occasionally a MACHO would
drift so as to lie in a direct line between two stars in the outer Milky Way
affect the light rays of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud with the result that the star would seem for a time to brighten
become obscured as a result of the microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud
temporarily increase the apparent brightness of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud by increasing the gravity of the star
magnify each color in the spectrum of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud by a different amount
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
支持主题(Supporting ideas)
旨在考察我们对文章细节的认知
这个题目定位在“The gravity of a MACHO that had so drifted, astronomers agree, would cause the star's light rays, which would otherwise diverge, to bend together so that, as observed from Earth, the star would temporarily appear to brighten, a process known as microlensing. ”。但是这个定位是根据我们对题干的观察得出的定位,选项中出现的东西几乎遍及全文,对每个选项都会有不同的定位。
选项分析:
A选项:漂移以至于存在于“Milky Way”外的两个星星之间的直连线上。这个选项定位在“Paczynski reasoned that if MACHO's make up this halo, a MACHO would occasionally drift in front of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a bright galaxy near the Milky Way.”原句告诉我们“MACHO”是在一个星星前而不是选项中说的在两个星星之间的连线上。
B选项:Correct. 影响一个在“Large Magellanic Cloud”中的星星的出射光以至于其会在一个时间段内显得非常明亮。同“考点”中的定位句,由于“MACHO”是漂移的,所以只有一段时间会明亮。明亮的原理定位句已经说的很清楚了。
C选项:由于在“Large Magellanic Cloud”中的“microlensing”变得很暗淡。文中第一句就提到了,“MACHO”本来就很暗淡。和在不在“Large Magellanic Cloud”中无关。
D选项:用提升星星重力的方法暂时的增加星星的明亮度。提升明亮度的原理错误。
E选项:用提升星星重力的方法暂时的增加星星的明亮度。提升明亮度的原理错误。
increasing the gravity错误
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论