With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
介宾短语放在句首作状语,一般修饰主句的动词或主句
且逻辑上the deer population has grown with no predators and with expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow相比其他选项来说更好,更通顺
另外,还有歧义的问题with no predators and expanses...可能理解为with no predators + with no expanses AD选项同理
With no natural predators and with expanses的主语必须是the deer population
前面的两个with是独立主格结构,主语是主句主语。“没天敌“”和“地盘扩大“的是deer population,不是officials或者estimate,所以C正确。
wildlife officials' estimate has grown表达错误
with no predator...的主语只能是deer population
这里的选项C,wildlife officials estimate 看着像是缺少连词,句子多了一个动词,但是这里可以看做是倒置:wildlife officials estimate (that) the deer population in NJ has ....
with no predator...的主语只能是deer population
首先理解句意:没有天敌➕有不允许捕猎的郊区绿地扩张
A:歧义 容易被理解为没有天敌、没有扩张
B:wildlife officials' estimate has grown表达错误
C:✅
D:歧义,容易被理解成without no hunting
E:estimate a deer population表达错误,estimate to be/with后面的逻辑主语是official,不合逻辑
句首用逗号隔开的介词宾语作状语,修饰身后的主句
没有天敌 & 不允许捕猎的郊区绿地扩张 -> 鹿的数量超过了17500头。correct
没有天敌 & 不允许捕猎的郊区绿地扩张 -> 专家们估计鹿的数量超过了17500头。incorrect
没有天敌 & 不允许捕猎的郊区绿地扩张 -> NJ拥有鹿群。incorrect
B主句estimate has grown to exceed 175000 语义错;
with no predator...的主语只能是deer population
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoodsde 逻辑主语是 the deer population,排除ABDE
A. with no A and B 歧义。
B. 主句逻辑意思错误, estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has grown 逻辑语义错误
D. 错误同A
E. estimate 用法错误。
The clue hers is to know what or which or who dose not have natural predators. Wildlife officials can not have predators, so dump A, B and E. New Jersey, a place also can not have predators. So drop D. What is left is C, indicating logically that the deer population has no natural predators and that is the obvious choice
a语义反了
b不是estimate 增长
d without no双重否定
e officials是句子主语,使句首的with结构修饰对象错误;estimate a deer population表达错误,应该是estimate to be/have sth
虽然,形式上with状语表原因,不需要逻辑主语,但事实上,要和主句主语要形成因果关系,所以,逻辑主语事实还是存在的。比如本题,由于没有捕食者和非捕猎区的扩大,所以受影响的就是鹿的数量的增长,主语必须是鹿的数量,而不是官方统计。
Here, with no natural predators serves as an adverb modifying has grown, correctly implying that the deer population HAS GROWN WITH NO NATURAL PREDATORS.
with引导的是伴随状语,从原句中可看出with引导的伴随状语伴随的对象是the deer population。需注意此点,弄清伴随状语所伴随的对象是哪个。
with 是关键,估计拿with 修饰officer不合适吧
句型相同成份不同;外延和内涵。
"I have nowhere to go" --> With nowhere to go, I can stay home and relax.
"There is no tree in which the bird can make a nest" --> With no tree in which to make a nest, the bird must construct one atop some man-made structure
"with no predators, the deer population..."
前面有natural predator