In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion.
The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the argument defends.
The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends.
The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is the position that the argument opposes.
The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the second is a conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that claim.
情景:略
推理:第一个黑体字描述了一个现象,这个现象的原因在后文一直被探寻。第二个黑体字给出了原因的一种,即,有一半以上是假的。论证最后是不同意这个结论的,并且给出了另外一个原因。
选题方式:略
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证批判的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是那个结论。
B选项:第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证批判的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是一个论证持有的立场。论证最后是不同意这个结论的。
C选项:第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证接受的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是论证的立场。本选项中,第一个黑体字没有错误,因为文章中给出的两个原因共用这一个现象,因此这个现象支持了两个结论。第二个黑体字所持有的立场不是论证支持的立场。
D选项:第一个黑体字是用来支持论证持有的结论的一个中间结论;第二个黑体字是论证反驳的立场。第一个黑体字是一个证据而不是结论。
E选项:第一个黑体字是论证争论的声明;第二个黑体字是基于这个声明而产生的结论。论证并没有对第一个黑体字所描述的现象产生任何异议(Correctly)。
第一个黑体字:没有客观方法检测,所以假的报告没法鉴别。第二个黑体:所以在那些报告率高的国家,有一半是假的报告。用了wrong to draw看出作者的态度是负面的。最后作者说了自己的观点:在没有赔偿的国家人们没有动力去报告,所以报告少,导致有赔付的国家看上去有一半是假的。所以,第一个黑脸是个基础support,第二个黑脸:基于黑脸得出的结论。这个结论是作者反对的/criticize的,最后作者提出新的观点/原因。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论