In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion.
The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the argument defends.
The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends.
The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is the position that the argument opposes.
The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the second is a conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that claim.
情景:略
推理:第一个黑体字描述了一个现象,这个现象的原因在后文一直被探寻。第二个黑体字给出了原因的一种,即,有一半以上是假的。论证最后是不同意这个结论的,并且给出了另外一个原因。
选题方式:略
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证批判的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是那个结论。
B选项:第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证批判的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是一个论证持有的立场。论证最后是不同意这个结论的。
C选项:第一个黑体字是一个用来支持论证接受的结论的是一个证据;第二个黑体字是论证的立场。本选项中,第一个黑体字没有错误,因为文章中给出的两个原因共用这一个现象,因此这个现象支持了两个结论。第二个黑体字所持有的立场不是论证支持的立场。
D选项:第一个黑体字是用来支持论证持有的结论的一个中间结论;第二个黑体字是论证反驳的立场。第一个黑体字是一个证据而不是结论。
E选项:第一个黑体字是论证争论的声明;第二个黑体字是基于这个声明而产生的结论。论证并没有对第一个黑体字所描述的现象产生任何异议(Correctly)。
1有赔付的国家的报告率是没有赔付的国家的两倍
2报告的真实性无法验证
commentator由1 2得到结论:报告率高的国家有一半的报告都是假的
作者认为:commentator的结论不对
因为 在没有赔付的国家,人们没有意愿去报道【也就是说!!! 并不是报告率高的国家有一半的报告是假的 而是另一些国家的报告率太低了 才导致有一些国家的报告率是他们的两倍!!!】
由此证明了commentator的结论是错误的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论