扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-CR-121
In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Over the last few years, the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily. Therefore, the number of Kravonians entering the job market who have at least the qualification of a college degree will eventually be significantly higher than it has been over the last few years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Kravonians with more than one college degree earn little more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
The average number of years Kravonian college students remain enrolled before completing a degree has been increasing over the past several years.
Despite the increase in the number of Kravonians attending college, the percentage of the population attending college is lower in Kravonia than in most other countries.
In recent years, employers have been requiring college degrees for workers in jobs that were previously performed successfully by Kravonians who did not have college degrees.
For many years, employers in Kravonia have had difficulty finding enough college graduates to fill the high-paying jobs that were available.
情景：有文凭的人比没有文凭的人挣得钱多。在Kravonia这个国家，参加大学的人变多了。因此，拥有至少一个大学学位的求职者人数最终要比以前多。
推理：
前提：参加大学的人变多了
结论：拥有至少一个大学学位的求职者人数最终要比以前多
选项分析：
A选项：Kravonia有超过一个学位的人比只有一个学位的人挣得会稍微多一点。本选项提到了“薪资”，但是并不是有学位的和没有学位的相比较。因此，本选项不能反驳结论。
B选项：Correct. Kravonia的学生在过去几年平均需要更长的时间来从大学中毕业。本选项可以反驳结论，即，入学人多不等于毕业生多。
C选项：尽管在Kravonia大学入学学生变多，但是Kravonia上大学的人数占总人口的比例仍然小于其他地区。本选项讨论的是Kravonia和其它地区的比较。
D选项：在近些年，那些本来可以被不具有大学学位的员工做好的职位也开始需求大学学位了。本选项和结论无关。
E选项： 招聘者一直很难招到具有大学学位的人来加入可提供的高薪职位中。推理文段中并没有讨论到挣钱多少的问题。
这道题我觉得不应该纠结在细枝末叶上，又不是考数学。 significantly higher 我们要反驳的是这个点。 近几年每年入学人数持续增加
根据常识我们都知道过几年毕业生肯定比以前多，但是b中的那个 The average number of years平均毕业需要的年数增加了，这是一个平均概念就是说有的人按时有的晚毕业，所以流入社会的毕业生肯定会增加，但是绝不会significantly higher。而且整个题都是围绕一个时间点 over the last few years.就是跟这几年比，50年以后还用比吗？照着这种趋势下去，肯定significantly higher。所以题中一直在强调这个over the last few years。
同意！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论