扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-SC-195
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.
the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in
that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to
in the northeastern United States, sandpipers' vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in
in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers' vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing
题目分析：
原句中出现了比较词like，其连接的两者需要保持对等，仅凭此点可以排除(C)(D)(E)。(A)(B)两个选项的考点识别有一定难度。
选项分析：
A选项：比较对象没有问题，即，用“农场”和“鸟”比较（此两者均在消失）。但是，本选项中的vanishing in the northeastern United States是现在分词短语，做the sandpipers的定语。这会使得the sandpipers成为is a result of residential and industrial development的主语，但在逻辑上，一种鸟不可能是一个结果，只能说在鸟身上发生的某些事情是一个结果。
B选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。as a result of residential and industrial development做the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States的状语。
C选项：未划线部分出现的like身后的内容和划线部分的主语不匹配，the grassy fields and old pastures不能和主语从句（发生在鸟身上的事）对比。
D选项：like连接的对比对象不对等，不能用the grassy fields and old pastures和sandpipers' vanishing比较。
E选项：like连接的对比对象不对等，不能用the grassy fields and old pastures和sandpipers' vanishing比较；整个句子没有谓语动词。
the COMPARISON here is between those fields and pastures (which are disappearing) and the bird (which is also disappearing); therefore, to make this comparison valid, the next sentence MUST start with "the bird" or "the sandpiper". it can't start with anything else.登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A：vanishing in the northeastern United States是定语，定语是修饰前面的sandpiper的，定语不是句子基本成分，去掉句子仍然完整，去掉后，就变成sandpiper is a result of ...., 逻辑意思有问题错误
2、注意ing分词的含义：A中vanishing in the northeastern United States是现在分词短语，做the sandpipers的定语。这会使得the sandpipers成为is a result of residential and industrial development的主语，但在逻辑上，一种鸟不可能是一个结果，只能说在鸟身上发生的某些事情是一个结果。
选项C（√）
Like 【the grassy fields and old pastures】 that the upland sandpiper（鹬） needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas,
{【the bird itself】 is vanishing in the northeastern United States 这件事} as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.
就像高地鹬在阿根廷潘帕斯越冬后于 5 月返回时需要觅食和筑巢的【草地和古老牧场】一样，
【这种鸟】本身正在美国东北部消失，由于住宅和工业发展以及耕作方式的变化。
选项A（×）：主系表
【the sandpipers 鸟】vanishing in the northeastern United States【is是】 a 【result结果】 of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.
一种鸟是一个结果（×）
在鸟身上发生的某些事情是一个结果（√）
A 本选项中的vanishing in the northeastern United States是现在分词短语，做the sandpipers的定语。这会使得the sandpipers成为is a result of residential and industrial development的主语，但在逻辑上，一种鸟不可能是一个结果，只能说在鸟身上发生的某些事情是一个结果。
也不对。因为类比的2个主体是草地和鸟，不能把草和鸟的消失对比登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
（A）主语是the sandpipers，the sandpipers is a result of...是错误的（⚠️事和物的问题）❌
（B）比较与逻辑均✅
A：vanishing是修饰sandpipers的定语，核心词是鸟，不能说鸟本身是结果
B：as a result原因状语是OK的，和草场一样，鸟的消失都是因为…
C：从句不能和东西比，只能跟句子比
DE：鸟的消失不能和草场比