There are several ways to build solid walls using just mud or clay, but the most extensively used method has been the forming of bricks out of mud or clay, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, they are laid in the wall in mud mortar.
the forming of bricks out of mud or clay, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, they are laid
forming the mud or clay into bricks, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, to lay them
having bricks formed from mud or clay, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, they were laid
to form the mud or clay into bricks, and, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, to lay them
that bricks were formed from mud or clay, which, after some preliminary air drying or sun drying, were laid
题目分析:
略。
选项分析:
A选项:在逻辑上,“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”应该是两个并列的动作,因此两者应该在语法形式上保持一致。不能一个是名词短语the forming of bricks out of mud or clay,一个是句子they are laid in the wall in mud mortar。
B选项:平行错误同(A)。
C选项:平行错误同(A)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项中的“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”是平行的。
E选项:本选项中formed和laid也是完全平行的,这一点上没有错误,但是两者都是从句的形式,这一点考查了“不定式和从句的区别”。用之于本题,由于主语和系动词讲的是:the most extensively used method is xxx,由此可知“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”均为人为的主观性事件(主语是method嘛,肯定是主观刻意的去做这件事),因此表语需要用不定式短语的形式。
题目分析:
略
选项分析:
A选项:在逻辑上,“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”应该是两个并列的动作,因此两者应该在语形上保持一致。
B选项:平行错误同(A)。
C选项:平行错误同(A)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项中的“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”是平行的。
E选项:本选项中formed和laid也是完全平行的,这一点上没有错误,但是两者都是动词的形式,这一点考查了“动词和不定式的区别”。用之于本题可知,由于主语和系动词讲的是:the most extensively used method is xxx,所以它们对于form和lay的预测力是很强的,并且“把砖放入泥土中(form the mud or clay into bricks)”和“把砖安放的墙中(lay them in the wall in mud mortar)”这两件事在整个句子发生的时段中并没有发生,所以formed和laid应该用不定式的形式。
请教一个关于主观性和客观性的判断问题,文中介绍 the most extensively used method 是否也可以理解为介绍的是一种客观的情况呢?
注意E中的那个关键字“不定式和从句的区别”中介绍的。判断表语时,要根据主语对这件事的影响来决定。不是我们主客观,而是主语主观地发出这件事,还是客观地描述。由于这里主语是method,所以肯定是主观的。
谢谢!为了加深理解,请问可以举一个客观的例子吗?
例如:My job is teaching GMAT.
这是对工作内容的一个客观描述。
谢谢~ 按照这个思路,像strategy, plan这样的主语,大部分情况下也应该理解为主观性是比较强的,对吗?
比如说,"The best strategy of country A is to make its citizens rich." "My plan is to review GMAT 3 hours a day."
另外,上面strategy这个句子,如果改成“The best strategy of a country is making its citizens rich.”是否也是可以的?只不过语感上就变成了对客观事实的一种陈述?
谢谢。不好意思问的有点儿多,看其他题的时候也不断的在思考这个知识点。
1. 是的
2. 不能改成ing短语做表语。因为,只要主语是plan类的,对表语所描述的事件都有“主观”的影响(表语讲的事件肯定是计划的内容,自然是被主观控制的嘛)。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论