Many economists believe that a high rate of business savings in the United States is a necessary precursor to investment, because business savings, as opposed to personal savings, comprise almost three-quarters of the national savings rate, and the national savings rate heavily influences the overall rate of business investment. These economists further postulate that real interest rates-the difference between the rates charged by lenders and the inflation rate-will be low when national savings exceed business investment (creating a savings surplus), and high when national savings fall below the level of business investment (creating a savings deficit). However, during the 1960's real interest rates were often higher when the national savings surplus was large. Counterintuitive behavior also occurred when real interest rates skyrocketed from 2 percent in 1980 to 7 percent in 1982, even though national savings and investments were roughly equal throughout the period. Clearly, real interest rates respond to influences other than the savings/investment nexus. Indeed, real interest rates may themselves influence swings in the savings and investment rates. As real interest rates shot up after 1979, foreign investors poured capital into the United States, the price of domestic goods increased prohibitively abroad, and the price of foreign-made goods became lower in the United States. As a result, domestic economic activity and the ability of businesses to save and invest were restrained.
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding the economists mentioned in the highlighted text?
Their beliefs are contradicted by certain economic phenomena that occurred in the United States during the 1960's and the 1980's.
Their theory fails to predict under what circumstances the prices of foreign and domestic goods are likely to increase.
They incorrectly identify the factors other than savings and investment rates that affect real interest rates.
Their belief is valid only for the United States economy and not necessarily for other national economies.
They overestimate the impact of the real interest rate on the national savings and investment rates.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
答案是A。原因是文章提到,虽然经济学家认为高水平的国民储蓄率会导致低实际利率和高度投资,但上世纪60年代美国却出现了背反这一观点的情况,以及1980年到1982年期间,尽管国民储蓄和投资量大致相等,但实际利率却突然飙升,这都证明经济学家的观点是被违反的,所以A选项是正确的。
考察了作者的态度:作者并没有反驳经济学家,而是在其基础上增加了一些其他的解释, 和这个态度不一致的选项可以排除
B-关于外国和本国商品价格涨跌是作者提出修正和进一步解释真实利率、存款率和商业投资关系的论据,和经济学家本来的argument无关
C-经济学家没有identify其他因素,作者填补了其他因素
d-不是经济学家的argument
E-这里和作者态度不符
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论