There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
还是不懂为什么E错了,求讲解
说说我的理解:E项主句是there be主系表结构,后面contributing肯定不能表示伴随,而是作adj修饰前面的名词monkfish。但语义错误,并不是某种鱼导致了depletion,而是捕鱼这种情况(circumstance)。此外,E项里都已经有contribute to 了,“导致了。。。” 后面再用because确实多此一举了。
懂了呢,谢谢~,后来我看曼哈顿语法书里说unlike后不能引导从句,所以E中unlike也是错的,对不?
嗯,确实没见过引导从句的
那么 A 中的 “a circumstance ” 这句做什么成分??
“a circumstance ”是同位语
请问为什么主系表后面不能跟伴随呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论