There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
1.平行,unlike只能对比名词,但是BDE的limits是不可比的。BDE错。
2.逻辑推理,C的which只能修饰前面的名词fish,但是这样句意就错了,C错。代词which不能指代一件事
3.修饰词,D的being用法错误,D错
4.简洁,becase they are...不如其他表达简洁。BE不好。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论