There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
BDE里边unlike的比较对象不对等,排除;C里边which的用法错误,排除。
the sentence is stating a contrast: condition X is true for cod and haddock, but false for monkfish.
here's another example, similarly constructed:
[i]There is no snow in Los Angeles, as there is in more northern locations.
there be句型的平行要补出there be。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论