Products sold under a brand name used to command premium prices because, in general, they were superior to nonbrand rival products. Technical expertise in product development has become so widespread, however, that special quality advantages are very hard to obtain these days and even harder to maintain. As a consequence, brand-name products generally neither offer higher quality nor sell at higher prices. Paradoxically, brand names are a bigger marketing advantage than ever.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the paradox above?
Brand names are taken by consumers as a guarantee of getting a product as good as the best rival products.
Consumers recognize that the quality of products sold under invariant brand names can drift over time.
In many acquisitions of one corporation by another, the acquiring corporation is interested more in acquiring the right to use certain brand names than in acquiring existing production facilities.
In the days when special quality advantages were easier to obtain than they are now, it was also easier to get new brand names established.
The advertising of a company's brand-name products is at times transferred to a new advertising agency, especially when sales are declining.
resolve the paradox意思是explain the discrepancy : 解释为啥价格一样,质量一样,还要选品牌的
A: take as guarantee
B: 反驳:消费者认为品牌下产品质量随着时间会改变
C: 公司合并,跟这没有关系
D: new brand name没办法解释brand name的市场效应,无关
E: 销售降低的时候,公司会换一个广告公司,也不是解释为啥消费者喜欢品牌的原因
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论