In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
Implementing the proposed laws is not to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
MARK摘抄:profit=govt revenue - govt expense. law 会使 revenue 降低, 也会减少 health care expense(人民身体变好),因为health 也是政府买单。 就削弱命题了
它因削弱吧。 不是果因才有它因削弱吗。。。纠结
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论