In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
Implementing the proposed laws is not to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
因:为了健康要减少烟草销售,但烟草税是重要政府收入来源
果:政府不能负担该法律
A health care都是由政府资助的—减少烟草可以减少health care 的医疗费—减少收入同时减少开支-balance政府可以负担
B W:该法律不会导致重大增加在烟草出口上 取反S: 烟草出口会增加--不影响税收 政府可以负担 是削弱不是增强 incorrect 注意是not to cause
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论