In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
Implementing the proposed laws is not to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
profit=govt revenue - govt expense. law 会使 revenue 降低, 也会减少 health care expense(人民身体变好),因为health 也是政府买单。 就削弱命题了
赞!
G地政府卖烟,烟导致健康问题。
立法会减少烟的收入
因此,无法负担得起立法。
削弱
猜:立法后还是能负担的起,尽管收入减少,支出也减少了。A项减少支出。
之前选的C,sales持平是过去的事情。没注意时态,将来立法后sales percent会减少。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论