A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.
RON:the correct answer should be necessary.
in other words, if it is NOT true, then the argument is invalid.
B取非:因为可以抵税才捐赠的人不是这些慈善机构的钱的唯一来源(慈善机构的钱有其他来源)。钱不能扣减--〉还是有人捐赠--〉这些捐赠的人如果捐少了,慈善机构还是可能会减少服务或者关门;这些人没有捐少,慈善机构不受影响。SO if B is not true, the argument is not necessarily invalid.
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论