扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-44
The Nile Delta of Egypt was invaded and ruled from 1650 to 1550 B.C. by a people called the Hyksos. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists' evidence,it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
Whether there were some artifacts found at Avaris that were unlike those produced in Ashkelon but that date to before 1700 B.C.
Whether the Hyksos ruled any other part of Egypt besides the Delta in the period from 1650 to 1550 B.C.
Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan
Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avaris
Whether many of the artifacts found at Avaris that are similar to artifacts produced in Ashkelon date to well before the Hyksos invasion
C：H人是从C国来的
Gap ：identical to 和A首都C国人在H侵略时期的一样， ≠就是H人侵略时带过来的
D A地C国人是否在1550之后继续生产相同的手工品
非常迷惑 ！！！
回答yes可以削弱，因为可能是1550之后传入埃及的
但是回答no不能加强，只知道不是1550以后得，可能是1650-1550H侵略传入的，也可能是1650之前 不是因为H侵略传入的。所以错
E 相似的手工品 年代是否在H侵略之前
回答yes,手工品在H侵略前就存在，即不是由H侵略带过来的，无法用手工品的相似 来说明 H就是从C来的
回答no，H侵略前不存在相似的手工品，说明就是这些就是H侵略时带过来的，H是从C来的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论