扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-45
Three large companies and seven small companies currently manufacture a product with potential military applications. If the government regulates the industry, it will institute a single set of manufacturing specifications to which all ten companies will have to adhere. In this case, therefore, since none of the seven small companies can afford to convert their production lines to a new set of manufacturing specifications, only the three large companies will be able to remain in business.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the author's argument relies?
None of the three large companies will go out of business if the government does not regulate the manufacture of the product.
It would cost more to convert the production lines of the small companies to a new set of manufacturing specifications than it would to convert the production lines of the large companies.
Industry lobbyists will be unable to dissuade the government from regulating the industry.
Assembly of the product produced according to government manufacturing specifications would be more complex than current assembly procedures.
None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.
3家大公司和7家小公司制造一军用产品。如果政府规范工业，它会设立一系列制造标准，让这些公司都遵守。这种情况下，由于7家小公司不能承受改造产品线的费用，只有3家大公司会保留下来。假设题 ->加强，取非找削弱;
A. 如果政府不规范，三家大公司中没有一家会退出市场；说的是规范以后会怎样，范围变了无关；
B. 谈小公司转到政府规范标准和转到大公司生产线的花费对比；无关；
C. 说客不能阻止政府规范产业；跳出逻辑链，无关
D. 政府规范的产品装配比现在装配程序更复杂；无关
E. 7家小公司没有一家制造产品遵循的规范和政府规范一致；取非则至少一家和政府规范一致，那就不止三家大公司，削弱题干的结论，正确
P：small companies can't 转换生产线 to 满足 政府的新生产规范new manufacturing specifications
C: only large companies remain （即，small companies not remain）
搭桥：E 小公司不能满足整改要求，留不下来，所以只有大公司留的下来
选项E（√）
None of the seven small companies currently manufactures the product to a set of specifications that would match those the government would institute if the industry were to be regulated.
目前，这七家 small companies没有一家按照政府在行业受到监管时制定的规格来生产产品。；取非：至少有其中一家 small companies 按照政府规范来生产产品，那 small companies就会remain，即不会只有large companies留下来 remain，所以削弱题干的结论（ only large companies remain）。
A. 如果政府不规范 if the government does not regulate，三家大公司中没有一家会退出市场；（×）原文讨论是规范的情况 If the government regulates，跳出范围，排
政府要进行管制
七家小企业支付不起转换设备的费用
因此只有三家大公司会保留他们的业务
前提：其实题目默认了七家企业一定要转换设备，那就意味着他们生产的产品目前不满足规定
background: 国家会发布一些列生产条款，要求一个行业内的10家公司都必须遵守。
因为7家小公司都负担不起将生产线调整到符合具体的标准，所以只有3家大公司会活下来继续营业。问assume
choice e, 7家小公司目前生产的产品没有一家是可以符合即将颁布的条款的要求的。correct，取非，只要有一家小公司符合即将发布的条款，那么结论：只有大公司能活下来就会被削弱
C错哪了啊 因为不能说服政府管理 所以都得遵守，取非→能说服就不需要遵守，哪里错了呢
一定要注意快速理清楚前提＋结论！！！
注意语气词 态度词 未发生的 已发生的 猜测的...等等等
因果
政府监管和小公司退出有一个gap，错选B，B选项后半段是莫名其妙加了一个对比，跟gap无关
错选了B
B It simply suggests one among a number of possible circumstances that could help
explain why none of the small companies could afford a conversion—if indeed a conversion is actually needed.
3家大公司和7家小公司制造一军用产品。如果政府规范工业，它会设立一系列制造标准，让这些公司都遵守。这种情况下，由于7家小公司不能承受改造产品线的费用，只有3家大公司会保留下来。假设题 ->加强，取非找削弱;
A. 如果政府不规范，三家大公司中没有一家会退出市场；说的是规范以后会怎样，范围变了无关；
B. 谈小公司转到政府规范标准和转到大公司生产线的花费对比；无关；
C. 说客不能阻止政府规范产业；跳出逻辑链，无关
D. 政府规范的产品装配比现在装配程序更复杂；无关
E. 7家小公司没有一家制造产品遵循的规范和政府规范一致；取非则至少一家和政府规范一致，那就不止三家大公司，削弱题干的结论，正确
B: the costs for converting might be the same; but the small companies may not be able to afford this cost of converting. He is assuming that the small companies will have to convert--that they don't already align with the new regulations--because if they are already aligned with the new regulations, they will not have to convert (ie, they are already converted!). If they are already converted, then the new regulations will not cause the small companies to collapse.
A: Author just says that if manufacturing is not regulated, the three large companies will remain in business.
He doesn't comment on what will happen if manufacturing is regulated. And the argument is about what will happen if industry is regulated. Thus you can drop A.
因果。
因果，取非削弱结果