The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX's decision, announced yesterday, to keep open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?
The Grenville refinery, although it operates at a higher cost than the Tasberg refinery, has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years.
Even though OLEX could consolidate all its refining at the Tasberg plant, doing so at the Grenville plant would not be feasible.
The Tasberg refinery is more favorably situated than the refinery with respect to the major supply routes for raw petroleum.
If the Grenville refinery were ever closed and operations at the Tasberg refinery expanded, job openings at Tasberg would to the extent possible be filled with people formerly employed at
Closure of the Grenville refinery would mean compliance, at enormous cost, with demanding local codes regulating the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites.
公司计划关掉一个厂子并且整合资源,会因此砍掉1200个工作岗位,以及影响到超过10000人的生活。因此公司宣布继续保留工厂,说明了公司的社会心超过了公司的利益。问weaken
choice b,尽管公司可以在T工厂整合资源,在G工厂整合就不那么可行。irrelevant,该选项可以说是motivation for plan
choice c,Tasberg炼油厂坐落在更合适的位置,就原油的供油路线来说。strength the conclusion
choice d, 如果G工厂关掉。T工厂业务扩张,在T工厂的新工作机会可能会让原先的员工来提供。irrelevant,该选项是执行计划以后的结果
choice e, 关掉G工厂意味着巨大的合规费用用于清理废弃的工厂旧址。correct,说明公司放弃计划还是出于成本的考虑
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论