扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-52
Consumer advocate: It is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumers' legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.
In the consumer advocate's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.
The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.
The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate defends; the second is that position.
题目：第一段黑体字：的确，每次取消限制以后，更多律师为自己打广告，并且律师费也降低了。
第二段黑体字：但是如果取消这个要求就不一样了（原来要求律师在广告里边要写明什么服务什么价）,很多现在打广告的律师会增加他们的律师费的。
所以第一段黑体字是个事实，第二段是个预测。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论