When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax revenues, which pay for such city services as police protection and maintenance of water lines, also decrease. The area to be policed and the number and length of the water lines to be maintained, however, do not decrease. Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible, since higher tax rates would cause even more residents to leave.
The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?
If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, some other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.
If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, neither the population nor the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period.
If a city's population declines sharply, police protection and water line maintenance are the services that deteriorate most immediately and most markedly.
A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those of other cities.
A city that is losing residents because tax rates are perceived as too high by those residents can reverse this population trend by bringing its tax rates down to a more moderate level.
这个题是prove the following claim,by using the above statements
A:前面都是文中所给,少population,公共安全和水管网不变,后面有点推测:因为tax变少,对那两个的spence 又不能变,所以能花的tax变少了,只能在其他方面缩减了
B:文中说了本来就不是tax rate导致人口减少的,只是说后面涨税,人会更少
C :文中说了人口少了,公共安全和水管网不变
D: 文中说了不宜加税,因为人会走,就算比其他地方的少,还是违背了文中给的条件
E: 跟B差不多,减税也不能让人口增加啊,因为最开始是人口开始减少,才导致一系列问题的出现
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论