Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the president's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the president's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?
Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the president's party.
The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
这道题很有趣。
B。negation一下就可以发现逻辑链了。题目conclusion指president的行为是公正的。那么要是B不成立,则意味着president自己的政党辖区也有很多问题,但是他没有去punish,这就是不公正了。所以B是必须的。
这道题讲真一开始看stimulus还真没有看出这个逻辑。我还在想他潜在假设是啥呢。anyway,这题真的只能看答案分析。提前分析可能都是事后诸葛亮。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论