扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-59
Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the president's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the president's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?
Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the president's party.
The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
我怎么感觉是因果呢。
前提（因）：所有取消的项目都是被认定为浪费的。
结论（果）：所以总统的选择是出于预算考虑而不是偏心自己的政党。
因果就是取非，然后反驳结论。
B：取非，认定的所有项目中大部分的项目都是总统这边的政党管的。然而，总统取消的大部分都是他的敌对党派的，这就削弱了结论，他其实是出于偏心的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论