扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-59
Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the president's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the president's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?
Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the president's party.
The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.
B意思是这个报告里的identified出来的浪费钱的项目大多数都不在总统政党的辖区内。
所以有90％在反对党的辖区是正常的。
因为如果report标注的浪费钱的项目大多数都在总统政党的辖区内，而取消的大多数在反对党的辖区，那么说明总统在选择取消项目上是有偏见的。
看到你这里，突然明白了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论