Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the reasoning above, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?
The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead.
The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.
The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates.
The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.
The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion.
B前面部分说的没问题,但是后面部分说的太绝对了,不是最好的strategy但是是这里支持的!
环保组织目标是保护土地from住宅发展
PlanA:从农民手里把地买过来 方案不行:原因有二
PlanB:帮助农民解决农场现代化他们就还可以用土地,不会买给别人
请问reasoning在这里是什么意思
推理?
等于argument
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这个题有点tricky,错选D,觉得D的第二部分讲的比较有道理
答案C:确实第一部分是conclusion,但不是主要的conclusion,觉得本题没有主conclusion
第一部分是总结了前一句提到的strategy有问题,第二部分提出了一个新的strategy,在第二部分之前说的reasoning就是引出了第二个strategy
cr
黑脸题
the 2nd one is a strategy不是为了support “plan is ill-conceived" conclusion而提出的考虑
前后是两个策略!!!!!
第一个肯定是结论啊!!排除AB
C选项:支持的策略(a more sensible preservation strategy)✅
D选项:no support❌前面就是理由啊
E选项:不是用来支持结论的,只是提出了一个可行的方案!!❌
第一个黑体就是文章的main conclusion-指出从农民手里买地的plan是有问题的
第二个黑体提出了作者认可的方案
遇到最高级时一定要谨慎:the best chance of reaching that goal. b选项错误
b选项best chance of reaching错,文中用的比较级
支持的不一定就是最好的
A plan不变 策略变了而已
支持的不一定就是最好的
A plan不变 策略变了而已
注意体会
支持的不一定就是最好的
所有绝对化的选项/结论都要注意
B的best chance 太绝对
好吧,这两句都是strategy……
这个题给666