Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods. All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced.
There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa.
Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are.
Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.
AB两者的取舍真的很容易让人中招,B只是说了有一种能够被培养成为主食的植物,但是这仅仅是有与没有,和有没有种植直接隔了十万八千里,即使有这种植物,当地人也不一定会去种植,所以只能说相关但是无法推论;而A就直接回答了问题:在rice和yam引进之前当地人没有种植其他可以作为主食的作物。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论