Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods. All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced.
There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa.
Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are.
Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.
cr
注意文中一句话“All the (recorded) staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere” 前提说的是所有有记载的。。。
那也可能引进以前种了但是引进以后就不再种了,也没有被记载下来的staple crop?是不是这么理解?
c句中没有说 “by the earliest agricultural societies ”这个无从考证,无关
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论