Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods. All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced.
There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa.
Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are.
Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.
A. 西非人没开发过某种主食,一旦米和甘薯引进这种主食就不再种植了;取反则为有一种主食在米和甘薯之前种植过,削弱,正确
B. 没有一种植物是本土的,如果种植,能做主食;谈的是假设,取反为即使有,但也不一定种植,无法削弱结论,错;
体会一下B的if,是一种可能性,不能保证削弱
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论