扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-66
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Surprisingly, perhaps, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest price the market will bear. Many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product,because they want to make as much profit as they can and technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed. The drawback is that large profits on the new product give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is the position the argument advocates; the second presents grounds for rejecting an alternative position.
The first is the position the argument advocates; the second is an alternative position that the argument rejects.
The first presents a strategy for achieving a certain goal; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.
The first presents a strategy for achieving a certain goal; the second presents grounds for preferring a different goal.
The first presents a strategy that, according to the argument, is ineffective; the second presents a way of improving the effectiveness of that strategy.
~~【Surprisingly】, perhaps, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest price the market will bear. --惊艳的策略2：新产品卖低价-=利润最大（∈作者的观点）
Many companies 【charge the maximum possible price 】for such a product, because they want to make as much profit* as they can and technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed. -- --大公司的策略1：新产品卖高价+原因
~~The drawback is that large profits* on the new product give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. --策略1：新产品卖高价的缺点
比竞争产品具有明显技术进步的产品通常可以卖出高价。
~~令人惊讶的是，最大化新产品整体利润的策略可能是收取低于市场所能承受的最高价格。
许多公司对此类产品收取尽可能高的价格，因为他们希望尽可能多地赚取利润，而技术进步往往会很快被超越。
~~缺点是新产品的高额利润给了竞争对手强大的动力去快速匹配新产品的能力。
A. The first is the position the argument advocates; the second presents grounds for rejecting an alternative position.（√）
A、第一是论证所主张的立场（--惊艳的策略2：新产品卖低价 ∈作者的观点）； 第二个提出了拒绝替代立场（= 策略1：新产品卖高价）的理由。
C. The first presents a strategy for achieving a certain goal; the second presents a drawback to that strategy.（×）
C. 第一个提出了实现某个目标的策略； 第二个是该战略的一个缺点。
strategy2（大多数公司）：定价=市场允许的最高价
bold2：strategy2的缺点
⚠️文段在讲2个策略 第一个黑体字的strategy是说［新产品卖低价］，第二个黑体字说的是另一个strategy的缺点：［新产品卖高价］
前面是支持，后面是否定，排除DE
剩下AB 第二个黑提部分在讲缺点（原因），它前面的一句话才是alternative的内容，所以选A！！！
根据十字交叉法：正结论 + 反事实。B：正结论 + 反结论，错！C：张冠李戴，把策略二的缺陷说成了策略一的缺陷，错！D：正结论 + 正事实，错！E：反结论 + 正事实，完全反了，错！
如果不这么做，就会有缺陷。
A和B的后半句我有点晕：
A-the second presents grounds for rejecting an alternative position. 黑体二是阐述了依据为反驳另一个观点。（这里我不理解，应该是反驳的主结论啊）
B-the second is an alternative position that the argument rejects.。黑体二是另一个观点在文中被反对的；（黑体二作者没有反对，所以错）
就是观点啊 不是结论。描述了另一种做法的缺点登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
已更新，感谢指正。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论