The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimated.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.
There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor.
There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans.
None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
既然要得到最大年龄值,即默认了两个方面①海洋最开始没有盐(题目已经提到)②过去这用来测量的1001年(样本)得是具有代表性的(或者是最小的都可以),如果过去这一百年的值突然贼大贼大,那你用作典型样本推而广之,得到的就不是maximum age了,而是最小值了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论