扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2012-CR-75
Certainly, pesticides can adversely affect the environment in localities distant from where the pesticide has actually been used. Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level. It is in the areas where pesticides are actually applied that they have their most serious effects. Just how serious these effects are depends on local conditions such as climate, soil type, and water supply. And local officials are much more likely than national legislators to be truly knowledgeable about such local conditions.
In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?
The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument;the second states that conclusion.
The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
The first identifies grounds for a potential objection to the conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
The first identifies grounds for a potential objection to the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
the conclusion of the argument is not explicitly stated but can be inferred - something like: even though pesticide use can have effects that stretch beyond local areas, the locals should handle that issue because they are more knowledgeable than national legislators. Thus, the second BF is not a conclusion itself, it is a support for that conclusion. Notice how the answer choices C and D differ only in what is a second BF.
cr
黑脸题
第二句不是直接结论而是在support 结论，结论是“regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level. ”
distant from 是以施放点为中心的一定范围内都受到污染（言下之意是光local 管是肯定不够的）——这部分黑体是作者反对的（并且还有Nevertheless表示转折）
结论：Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level.
第二部分黑体是对结论的解释
main conclusion:Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level 对农药使用的法规应该以地方为单位，而不是国家为单位。
黑脸1: fact，构成了一个对于结论可能存在的反对的基础。
黑脸2: evidence,用于支持结论
一个nevertheless就可以决定选项了
你这种评论 跟没回复一样 装B而已！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
开头的第一句话有点难懂拖慢了做题的速度
pesticides can adversely affect the environment in |localities|（distant from where the pesticide has actually been used）.
就是说 杀虫剂可以影响到适用范围以外的地点的environment
看到BF1和main conclusion之间有个Nevertheless，表转折。说明方向不同
注意单词：distant from
真是大脑没有在工作
当然，杀虫剂对离使用杀虫剂地点很远地方的环境有负面影响。然而，杀虫剂的使用规范不应该是全国范围，而应该是本地范围。杀虫剂有严重影响的地区也是杀虫剂实际使用的地区。这些影响严重程度依靠本地条件如气候、土壤、水供应。本地官员比国家机关更可能了解本地情况。
分析原文，两黑体间有转折词Nevertheless，所以两黑体是反对关系，第一黑体提出了一个对结论有负面影响的理由； 主结论是转折后面那句话。 Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level, 结论后的部分包括第二黑体都是对结论进行支持。所以答案是D
1. main conclusion:Nevertheless, regulation of pesticide use should not take place at the national level but at the local level. 排除ABC
2. 看到BF1和main conclusion之间有个Nevertheless，表转折。说明方向不同 排E选D