The modern multinational corporation is described as having originated when the owner-managers of nineteenth-century British firms carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies. Increases in the volume of transactions in such firms are commonly believed to have necessitated this structural change. Nineteenth-century inventions like the steamship and the telegraph, by facilitating coordination of managerial activities, are described as key factors. Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion: the volume of their transactions is assumed to have been too low and the communications and transport of their day too primitive to make comparisons with modern multinationals interesting.
In reality, however, early trading companies successfully purchased and outfitted ships, built and operated offices and warehouses, manufactured trade goods for use abroad, maintained trading posts and production facilities overseas, procured goods for import, and sold those goods both at home and in other countries. The large volume of transactions associated with these activities seems to have necessitated hierarchical management structures well before the advent of modern communications and transportation. For example, in the Hudson's Bay Company, each far-flung trading outpost was managed by a salaried agent, who carried out the trade with the Native Americans, managed day-to-day operations, and oversaw the post's workers and servants. One chief agent, answerable to the Court of Directors in London through the correspondence committee, was appointed with control over all of the agents on the bay.
The early trading companies did differ strikingly from modern multinationals in many respects. They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests. Their top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share, whereas senior managers' holdings in modern multinationals are usually insignificant. They operated in a preindustrial world, grafting a system of capitalist international trade onto a premodern system of artisan and peasant production. Despite these differences, however, early trading companies organized effectively in remarkably modern ways and merit further study as analogues of more modern structures.
The passage suggests that modern multinationals differ from early chartered trading companies in that
the top managers of modern multinationals own stock in their own companies rather than simply receiving a salary
modern multinationals depend on a system of capitalist international trade rather than on less modern trading systems
modern multinationals have operations in a number of different foreign countries rather than merely in one or two
the operations of modern multinationals are highly profitable despite the more stringent environmental and safety regulations of modern governments
the overseas operations of modern multinationals are not governed by the national interests of their home countries
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
推断(Inference)
旨在考察我们对文章的深度理解,以及逻辑推断能力。
这个题目比较容易定位,根据关键词很容易定位在文章的最后一段。读懂最后一段的三处不同就可以很容易的解决这道问题。要注意,问题中问的是,现代和早期的不同,文章中说的是早期和现代的不同。
选项分析:
A选项:顶级的现代多国公司的管理人员们拥有自己公司的股票而不仅仅是只领薪水。这个选项定位在“Their top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share, whereas senior managers' holdings in modern multinationals are usually insignificant.”。这句话说的早期的公司。所以这个选项是错误的(说反了)。
B选项:现代的多国公司依靠国际资金贸易系统而不是不现代的贸易系统。原文中定位在“They operated in a preindustrial world, grafting a system of capitalist international trade onto a premodern system of artisan and peasant production. ”即原来的公司嫁接了国际资金贸易系统,现代的公司显然是没有嫁接的。
C选项:现代多国公司在多个国家的进行运转而不是只在一两个国家内运转。这个选项属于无中生有,文中没有提及此项内容。
D选项:尽管环境残酷和现代政府的安全规定,多国公司这样的操作依然很有利益可图。文中没有提到环境和安全问题,也没有说是否有利可图。
E选项:Correct. 海外的多国公司的操作并不是受国家的利益所影响的。这句话定位在“They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests. ”。这句话说的是早期的公司是受影响的,所以现代的公司是不受影响的。
对比different题,常取非
初读时先不读这个部分,读到本题时再读并记笔记总结三点。
A:对应第二点,是原来公司如此
B:对应第三点,是原来公司如此
CD:未提及相关内容
E:对应第一点,取非可得
总结:三个选项各对应一点,说反或者部分篡改;两个选项根本未提及
首先看清楚谁比谁,morden还是之前的;
再其次看清楚这是个infer题,题里没有明确说明
operation 被国家利益支配,这句有点微妙,如果换成被国家利益影响,可能不该选。但是支配很武断,再讲不同时,已经说了前期公司的特点是受国家支配了。所以反推。
grafting a system of capitalist international trade onto a premodern system of artisan and peasant production将资本主义嫁接到现代之前的体系里;
not governed by the national interests 不被国家利益支配,而不是说不被政府机构管理
rc
问的是differ
迅速定位最后一段differ开头的
文中句意与选项句意转换 They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.
==同意取反“the overseas operations of modern multinationals are not governed by the national interests of their home countries”
rc
问的是differ
迅速定位最后一段differ开头的
文中句意与选项句意转换 They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.
==“the overseas operations of modern multinationals are not governed by the national interests of their home countries”
E选项真的是不够有说服力啊 早期公司 depend heavily 那么取非不应该是 现在的公司 don‘t depend heavily么? 这并不是说不需要 not governed 啊??
同意,not太绝对了
哈哈,大哭的反面可以是小哭也可以是不哭,depend heavily的相反处可以在depend也可以在heavily。主要这里说的是不再受国家利益支配,按常识看,现在在海外做生意是不必带着给国家谋利的思维了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests.
最后一段都是反着来的,聊的是early的特点,反过来看就好
E,早期受影响,既然是不同那么就说明,现在跟这个相反就可以了,即:不受影响
The early trading companies did differ strikingly from modern multinationals in many respects. They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests. [ 3 differences are listed like" they... they... they... " and "they" refers to "The early trading companies" So it's clear that the passage only explained one side characteristic.
a substantial minority share不是少量股票的意思吗?原文说早期的高级经理人持有少量的股票,那现代的高级经理人与之相反持有股票多,为什么不对呢?
insignificant词意理解反了
Choice B is incorrect: the passage indicate that early chartered trading companies DID depend on a system of capitalist international trade by "grafting a system of capitalist international trade onto a premodern system"