A recent poll of elected officials suggests that candidates, when in the midst of a tough campaign, often make statements about an opponent that they may not think is true.
is
are
to be
of as
it is
题目分析:
想正确得到本题的答案,需要对嵌入式关系分句概念十分熟悉。
选项分析:
A选项:如果在划线部分填入is,则根据就近修饰原则,定语从句that they may not think is true必然修饰一个最近的单数名词。按照嵌入式关系分句的概念,该句可以还原为:
they may not think (that) an opponent is true.
在逻辑上,它们可能不认为对的,应该是“言论”,而不是“对手”。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:填入的to be后,该定语从句不再是嵌入式关系分句,就算该从句可以跳跃修饰名词statements,代入先行词则有:
they may not think statements to be true.
复合宾语statements to be true需改为宾语从句。这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于think是看法类动词且属于主动语态,所以约束力较弱,应该用宾语从句。
D选项:of和as均为介词,放在一起导致了语法错误。
E选项:若填入it is,则整个句子变为:
they may not think (that) it is true.
该定语从句中什么成分也不缺少,导致了先行词无法在定语从句中充当任何成分。
定语从句不是应该紧邻被修饰的词吗?那 that they may not think are true 不是应该修饰紧邻的被修饰词opponent, 怎么就成修饰 statements 啦?
一般which是贴着修饰,that是可以跳的
A of ..., which ...
of ...修饰A,which也可以修饰A,两者都修饰A,次序可以有一点差异,摘自manhattan。
所以我就觉得,一般情况下,which和that是就近,但是不能绝对,还是要理解意思和逻辑才可以。这题我就秒错了。
没错,意思和逻辑是最重要的判断标准,只要语法上不是绝对的错误就可以接受。
OG19里·· in B, which``` which都能代指B了····
我记得gmat里which一般都紧贴前面的修饰物的,除了一些例外。最近在复习GRE,里面which根本无规则,随缘修饰,过了很久我才适应。说多是泪。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论