In a state of pure commercial competition, there would be a large number of producing firms, all unfettered by governmental regulations, all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other.
all seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than each other
all seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than the others
each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than one another
each seeking to meet consumer needs and wants more successfully than the others
each seeking more successfully to meet consumer needs and wants than another
题目分析:
本题中的比较词为more successfully than,(A)中对比的两者为“所有公司(all)”和“每一个(each other)”;(B)(E)中对比的两者为to meet consumer needs and wants和the others(其他公司);(C)中对比的两者为“每一个公司(each)”和“另一个公司(one another)”;(D)中对比的两者为“每个公司”和“其他公司”。在逻辑上,“每个公司”都想比“其他公司”在达到消费者预期(meet consumer needs and wants)方面更加成功,所以能合理的产生“更成功(more successfully than)”关系的两者是“每个公司”和“其他公司”,可以排除(A)(B)(C)(E),答案为(D)。
选项分析:
略
the others: 除了主语以外的那些人
one another:另外的某一个人
each better than the others,每个人比剩下的人好
签名好评哈哈哈哈哈登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
哈哈哈登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
a. Laurel and Hardy love each other.
This sentence means that Laurel loves Hardy. And Hardy loves Laurel. So here we have reciprocal action here.
b. All the cartoon characters start fighting with one another towards the end of the show.
This sentence means that one cartoon character was fighting with every other character. Here to the action is reciprocal.
However, the original meaning of the sentence does not intend to express reciprocal actions. It actually compares all the producing firms with one another. On this basis, choices A and C can be eliminated for incorrect use of “each other” and “one another”.
每個人想和剩下所有人的其中一個人比——錯誤
每個人想和剩下所有人比——正確
每個人想和剩下所有人的其中一個人比——錯誤
每個人想和剩下所有人比——正確
A,all对比each other,语义是所有人都想自己最厉害,而不是比对方厉害
B,all 对应the other???逻辑有问题,本来就是所有人了。more successfully位置都可以。
C,each对应one another,每个人对应另外的某一个人,这是一对一的关系。
D,each对应the others,一个人跟其他所有人比较
E,一个人对应另外某个人。
A,all对比each other,语义是所有人都想自己最厉害,而不是比对方厉害
B,all 对应the other???逻辑有问题,本来就是所有人了。more successfully位置都可以。
C,each对应one another,每个人对应另外的某一个人,这是一对一的关系。
D,each对应the others,一个人跟其他所有人比较
E,一个人对应另外某个人。
在理解语境的基础上,判断这几个代词的用法
all infetted是一个定语,状语可以转化成定语
但是他有一个all,是代指前面集合名词的all;类似于 ... , a discovery that...
"..., a discovery that..."这样就是同位语啦,可这里并不是同位语啊。。。
只是说类似于吧,曼哈顿里有讲。我自己的整理是这样的:① 当从句修饰主句中,集合名词的一部分的时,有三种常见修饰第一种:…, some of which…做主语,后加谓语和宾语,形成完整的句子
第二种:…, some of them...做主语,不能加谓语,只能用伴随的方式,形成非完整的句子
第三种:…, some…做主语,不能加谓语,只能用伴随的方式,形成非完成的句子
我这里记录的做主语 指的是 some of which做从句的主语;伴随的意识是 some of them unfettered by...而不是 some of them were unfettered by,其中some可以替换为all each 等等
总结很棒哦!感谢分享~C,D,E选项是独立主格,这个我是知道的。不过按照你的说法,some, all, each+分词短语也可以构成独立主格(之前只知道有each型独立主格),这样一来A和B就是独立主格结构,那就是状语无疑了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
the place that "successfully" is placed alters its modification. 当在seeking后面,意思变成了“成功的找寻”,而事实上it should modify the "meet",是公司们谁能更成功的满足...所以B&E are eliminated.