Reptiles, by drawing their body heat directly from the Sun rather than burning calories to generate it, can survive on ten percent of the nourishment that a mammal of similar size would normally require.
rather than burning calories to generate it
rather than the generation of body heat by burning calories
and not from generating it by burning calories
instead of by burning calories for generating it
instead of body heat generated by burning calories
题目分析:
本题比较简单,考查了基本的语法平行。本题中需要两者取一(rather than)的应该是“直接从太阳那里获得热”和“燃烧卡路里以产生热”。两者应该在语法形式上保持平行,可以排除(B)(C)(E)。
选项(A)和选项(D)的迷惑性相对较高。介词短语 for generating it需改为不定式短语to generate it。这点考查了不定式和ing的区别。用之于本题,由于变化部分是burn的宾语的补足语,所以应根据其主句谓语动词burn来判断。在逻辑上,“燃烧卡路里”显然可以控制“生产热”这个行为的发生与否,即,本题中的burn的控制力较强,宾补中应该用不定式短语。
答案为(A)。
选项分析:
略
"instead of" contains "of", which should be followed by a noun. so, "instead of" should be followed by a noun (or by something that acts as a noun, such as some -ing forms).
on the other hand, "rather than" can connect just about any two similarly structured things.
nouns: I decided to purchase a truck rather than a car.
adjectives: I wish this transmission were manual, rather than automatic.
etc.
also, it can connect things that aren't technically the same grammatically but that play the same grammatical role. e.g.
it's best to read the passages quickly, rather than with precise attention to every little detail.
--> here, both the adverb "quickly" and the modifier "with precise attention..." modify the action of reading the passages. so, all good.
there's also a very slight difference in meaning. I'll bet you 99.99% that gmac will never actually test this, but ...
... "X instead of Y" means that "Y" was some sort of default / assumed/preferred outcome, but that X has been substituted for it.
... "X rather than Y" indicates no such preference; it just means that there were options X and Y, and, this time, X won.
e.g.
He paid with a check rather than cash.
--> He had two options, and chose the check.
He paid with a check instead of cash.
--> He was supposed to pay in cash, but he paid with a check.
again, the likelihood that this will ever actually be tested is pretty much nil, but, there it is.
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论