The industrial pollutants known as PCB's were first manufactured in 1929 and were used as coolants for electrical equipment in Europe and North America the 1970s, when studies showed that the compounds had entered the food chain and were harmful to some animals.
that the compounds had entered the food chain and were harmful to some animals
the compounds to have entered the food chain and be harmful to some animals
the entry of the compounds into the food chain as harmful to some animals
the entry of the compounds into the food chain and its harmfulness to animals
the compounds entering into the food chain and harming some animals
题目分析:
在(A)(B)(D)(E)中,具有and关系的是enter和were两个句子(或名物化后的名词);在(C)中,enter和harmful之间是as关系(这里as是介词,意思是“作为”)。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:不定式短语 the compounds to have entered the food chain and be harmful to some animals需改为宾语从句 that the compounds had entered the food chain and were harmful to some animals。这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。用之于本题,由于show的控制力较弱,所以其宾语部分应用宾语从句。
C选项:名词短语the entry of the compounds into the food chain需改为宾语从句that the compounds had entered the food chain。这点考查了名词和从句的区别。用之于本题,由于研究揭示的内容在本题中可以被认为是“事实”,而事实没有时间终止点,应该用宾语从句。另外,enter和harmful之间应是并列关系而不是“作为”关系。
D选项:名词短语the entry of the compounds into the food chain错误同选项(C)。
E选项:在语法上,通常只有感官动词才允许在宾语的补足语中用分词短语,例如:
I see a man standing outside.
显然地,show不是感官动词,不允许宾补部分用ing短语。
感觉变成until the 1970s应该会好理解一点为什么用had enterd
很奇怪国外的论坛里此题的都有until,但国内却没有。。。
由于时间的发生必然具有一定的时间和空间属性,没有时间属性(时态)的动词是不可能指代一个事件的。这样的动词不完全属于动词的范畴,即所谓的”非范畴化“。
带to do 宾部的动词,一般都是约束力比较强的词,比如force, allow等
大哥 题干错误,应该是until the 1970s.
B选项show n. to do 语义错误,意思是展示化合物去干什么,不正确
怎么视频讲解和文字讲解相差甚远啊
我也发现了 视频主要是从语意 上面来讲的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
mark 在语法上,通常只有感官动词才允许在宾语的补足语中用分词短语,例如:I see a man standing outside.
显然地,show不是感官动词,不允许宾补部分用ing短语。
A选项的had entered和were时态不一致也可以么?
语义核心是阐述两件事,而不是某个名词。
这题可以用核心词变换解题吗?BCDE核心词都是名词,A的核心词是这件事~
只有感官动词才能加分词宾语补足语
I see a man standing there.
感官动词才能+宾语补足语
名词与从句区别/不定式与从句/核心词
用之于本题,由于研究揭示的内容在本题中可以被认为是“事实”,而事实没有时间终止点,应该用宾语从句。(跟evidence一样)
老师,这个题怎么解,AE两个答案最好说详细一点,我感觉你给我们的资料上的答案没看太懂!