Geologists have found that streams in the Karoo basin of South Africa changed suddenly at the end of the Permian period 250 million years ago, from the meandering shape typically found in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern found in areas without deep-rooted vegetation to hold the soil together.
from the meandering shape typically found in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern found in areas without deep-rooted vegetation to hold
from the meandering shape typically found in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern that they find in areas without deep-rooted vegetation for holding
from the meandering shape typical in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern found in areas where it is without deep-rooted vegetation for holding
shifting from the meandering shape typically found in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern found in areas where it is without deep-rooted vegetation for holding
shifting from the meandering shape that is typical in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern being found in areas without deep-rooted vegetation to hold
题目分析:
略
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:the braided pattern的定语从句 that they find in areas中的复数代词they没有指代对象。其在字面上可以指代句首的geologists,但在逻辑上,发现the braided pattern于那些没有植被覆盖的地方的应该是农民,其它的科学家等等的各种人,不是(或不仅是)这些地理学家。另外,介词短语for holding the soil together需改为不定式短语to hold the soil together。这点考查了不定式和ing的区别,用之于本题,显然地,“没有深根植被的覆盖”对“将土壤抓在一起”的发生与否有直接的影响。
C选项:代词it没有指代对象;介词短语for holding the soil together错误同选项(B)。
D选项:本选项错误同(C)。
E选项:分词短语being found表示同时性。但在本题中,found事件和shift from A to B事件不具备同时发生的关系。因此,being应该去掉。
"to hold" and "for holding": here's no real reason to even worry about the idiom. That's classic GMAT SC: distract us with a split that doesn't matter much, while the real issues lie elsewhere.
你解释的太别扭
【without deep-rooted vegetation“没有深根植被的覆盖”】对【hold the soil together“将土壤抓在一起”】的发生:有直接的影响,用to do,而不是for doing
Geologists have found that
streams in the Karoo basin of South Africa changed suddenly at the end of the Permian period 250 million years ago,
from the meandering shape typically found in well-vegetated zones to the braided pattern found in areas 【without deep-rooted vegetation】 to 【hold the soil together】.
地质学家发现,
在 2.5 亿年前的二叠纪末期,南非卡鲁盆地的溪流突然发生了变化,
从通常在植被茂密的地区发现的蜿蜒形状到 到 在没有根深蒂固的植被的地区为了将土壤抓在一起的编织图案。
请问D和E选项,伴随状语shifting的逻辑主语是不是streams?还是geologists?我觉得应该是宾语从句中的streams
你说的对~是streams。状语通常是就近修饰一个句子,这个最近的句子,就是咱们上课讲的它的主句。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
啥解释。。农民?seriously..wtf?
DE: Shift 和from赘余
C: it 不管做形式主语还是代词都错
shifting 冗余
介词短语没有主语,但是加上shifting就是分词短语了,有主语,我觉得有主语好一点,就排除了ABC
change 和shift语意重复。
冗余
不定式和ing的区别。真的好迷。。。
是因为。“没有深根植被的覆盖”对“将土壤抓在一起”的发生与否有直接的影响吗?所以有直接影响的就用to do?
shift和change一个意思,这就重复了,所以DE不对。
B,to the braided pattern that they find in areas VS to the braided pattern found in areas
一个是主动式,动作的发起者是they,the Geologists,一个是不带动作发起者的被动式。地理学家发现的是流从某种form转到某种pattern,至于“这个pattern是在某个区域被发现的“这件事,不是这帮地理学科发现的,应该是其他人发现的。用不带动作发起者的被动式更优。
shift和change一个意思,这就重复了,所以DE不对。
C选项:代词it没有指代对象;介词短语for holding the soil together错误同选项(B)。
D选项:本选项错误同(C)。
E选项:分词短语being found表示同时性。但在本题中,found事件和shift from A to B事件不具备同时发生的关系。因此,being应该去掉。
B. the braided pattern的定语从句 that they find in areas中的复数代词they没有指代对象。其在字面上可以指代句首的geologists,但在逻辑上,发现the braided pattern于那些没有植被覆盖的地方的应该是农民,其它的科学家等等的各种人,不是(或不仅是)这些地理学家 for+doing 表示物体的功能, to do 才表示目的
C it只能指代 holding soil together 但是逻辑意思不对,且 for +doing 表示物体的功能
shifting is redundant,and in D, ‘it is’ is wrong
我倒是觉得d,e错的原因是shifting多余,为划线部分的的宾语从句里的changed就已经表示了改变的意思了,所以后面可以直接接from...to...
changed from.. to...
考点:
不定式和ing的区别
代词的指代问题
being--同时发生
“没有深根植被的覆盖”对“将土壤抓在一起”的发生与否有直接的影响