这种考法在句子改错中考查的并不多。原因很简单,现在分词和动名词通常不充当相同的成分,动名词一般充当主干,分词充当修饰,谁也不干预谁。但是,有一种情况会让两者重叠,即, 当介词短语做状语时,其有可能和现在分词短语做伴随状语出现同成分的情况,例如:
(1) By using a pen, I wrote a book.
(2) **Using a pen, I wrote a book.
两个例句的划线部分,句(1)的using a pen是一个动名词短语,句(2)中其是一个现在分词短语。那么,这样的两者应该怎么判断呢?实际上,"Using" 是隐含的, 在句中的 "using" 确有 "by using" 的意思, 但这不代表 "using" 就一定是 "by using". "using" 其实只是把两句联系起来, 而没有把他们的关系明确指出. 以下有两句例句, 会更明显:
(a) Using his trendy hair gel again, John created yet another brilliant hair style.
(b) Using his trendy hair gel again, John got punished by the disciplinary teacher.
两者都是隐含写法, 但根据语意, 显然地:
在 (a), John 是通过 "Using his trendy hair gel again" 这方法来 "created yet another brilliant hair style"
在 (b), John 是因为 "Using his trendy hair gel again" 而导致 "got punished by the disciplinary teacher. , 而不是通过的方法.
所以在这情况下, (a) 也可以写成:
By using his trendy hair gel again, John created yet another brilliant hair style.
而 (b) 是:
Because of using his trendy hair gel again, John got punished by the disciplinary teacher.
(而不是 "By using")
总括而言, "Using" 和 "By using" 是写作手法上的分别。如果用了using,表明主从句实质上是因果关系,如果用了by using,表明主从句实质上是方式关系,例如(1)(2)两个例句,我们只能用(1)而不能用(2),这是因为,我们不能说:
因为用钢笔,所以我写了一本书。
伴随状语表示伴随主句动作的原因/条件/伴随发生的情况或对主句的解释说明,(1)句一个都套不上,所以是错的。
我赞同au的观点,doing的确是可以表示因为,也可以表示其它,譬如方式、伴随等。
Using a pen, I wrote a book. 这个应该是对的,表方式
Crossing the street, I found a crying boy. 这个也是对的,表时间伴随
因此doing构成独立主格结构位于句首,可以表因为,但不限于因为。
以上是我个人观点,如有错误,请指教。
√ Using his trendy hair gel again, John created yet another brilliant hair style.
× Using a pen, I wrote a book.
老师按理说,上面的句子对,下面的句子也应该是对的吧。