When speaking about ratios as is done here, you cannot leave 'times' hanging like this. sometimes you can use pronouns - the height of the sears tower is more than four times that of the statue of liberty - but you can't use empty space. choice c exhibits proper usage of 'times' followed by their pay. it also uses the ratio, a correct identification of exactly what is being described.
不要想太多。。这道题放在最后一般没人错,没时间了不会多想。。。
e 不是technology的使用,而是结果。
要读完题啊,选b,
莽撞选a了
比较的是收费不是机构。
Because of the principles driving them, other mandates that can be applied to reduce or eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs.————对于这句话的理解是核心,other mandates can solve the pay gaps between men and women if they hold same jobs but can't solve the problem if they hold different jobs, however, comparable worth can.
d是为什么呢?
choice a, 还原 CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than bule-collar workers (do)是可以接受的,但是compared to a ratio of 42 times,比较对象是419 times 和 a ratio
choice b, a ratio作为了419 times的同位语。比较对象依然是a ratio 和42 times
choice c, 比较对象是419 times和42 times。correct
choice d,e没有谓语动词
a没有满足在不同领域的工作——这题要小心,对文意理解有偏差导致错误
一个结论对应两个因素或由两个因素构成,在选假设条件时要考虑到每一个条件!!!
grain的消耗来自1.直接吃2.猪吃
结论:粮食产量不增加,所以需要进口粮食和猪肉
E取反,猪肉消耗会减少对粮食的消费,那么多出来的粮食可以用来养猪,这样就不需要进口粮食了,削弱了结论
【实验题】
评估条件:寻找第三个新的变量
美国的产量=欧洲出口+本土
为了保持产量不变,随着欧洲占据其本土市场,美国只能增加本土需求
c就像欧洲希望本土具有竞争力,美国也是(占据本土市场后就会有竞争力)
错选e美国目前的市场很小,目前不代表将来,就算有潜力也不一定会在未来有竞争力【未提及核心】
b选项巴士乘客数量不会减少,因此不会影响收入 strengthen
错选d weaken
另一种渔业中small sharks活下来会吃掉其他鱼 影响经济
【计划削弱题】
in onder to...
原文中包含两方面:渔业和旅游业 最终计划中只提到一种
削弱条件:另一种!!
【类比题削弱】
找两个类比对象的不同之处(一个行 但另一个不行)
如题中:自然界中的xx(实验室中)晶体机构未知
choice e: 独立主格with much of the profit used for paying higher taxes, 往前修饰it was profitable overseas。 然而从逻辑上1)在海外盈利 和2)利润都用于支付高昂的税金 ;这两句话并不具备修饰关系
1.and的前後要平行工整
2.是否"合句" 要看是否並對等
travel和ricochet做为合句不正确,应让travel做伴随状语。这是因为,合句是并列关系,状语是从属关系,本题中,“地震波在冷的条件下更快”是“地震波在内层跳动”的一个属性,即,跳动这个行为的速度属性。因此,两件事只能是从属关系,而不能是并列关系。
咦,原来评论区是你做笔记的地方呀~~
沒錯 回頭比較好review
It was, therefore, not surprising that dozens of other countries attempted to follow their model, yet no countries-with the possible exceptions of Malaysia and Thailand-have even approached their success.