In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
在经济衰退的时候,Vargonia公立学校的职位不会减少。这是因为V出台法律规定公立学校面向全部儿童开放,并且要求目前的学生/教师比率不会被超过。问strengthen
choice a, 目前的学生/教师比率比在最近一次的经济危机的学生/教师比要高。irrelevant
choice b, 在最近经济景气的时候,25%的学生去了私立学校,这些学校收费很高。correct, 暗示当经济衰退的时候这些学生就回到公立学校,因此公立学校老师就不够用了
choice c, 公立学校目前多雇佣了20%的教师,比起上一次经济危机之前,irrelevant
choice a,c都在和以前的经济危机作比较,但是两次经济危机在有限的信息之下不具备可比性
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论